ANALYSIS OF THE CALCULATION OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ACCORDING TO THE DATA OF THE STATE METEOROLOGICAL STATION
Abstract
Since direct measurement of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is a complex, time-consuming and expensive process, the most common procedure is to estimate ET0 from climate data. The purpose of this study was to perform reference evapotranspiration calculations based on the data of the state meteorological station Askania-Nova and compare them with the actual ET0 data obtained using an automatic Internet meteorological station. The data for the study were taken from the state meteorological station Askania-Nova (township Askania-Nova, Kakhovsky district, Kherson region, 46.45°N 33.88°E) and the automatic Internet meteorological station iMetos IMT 300 from the company "Pessl Instruments", which is located at the meteorological site of the Askaniysk DSDS (Tavrychanka village, Kakhovsky district, Kherson region, 46.55°N, 33.83°E). Standard evapotranspiration was calculated using the Penman-Monteith method (FAO56-RM). To assess the accuracy of ET0 calculations, mean absolute percent error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE) and Standard Error of Estimate (SEE ) were determined. According to the results of the comparison of indicators from two meteorological stations, it was found that the smallest errors are inherent in the daily average and maximum temperature and relative air humidity (MAPE<10%), for the minimum temperature and relative air humidity, the MAPE errors are 18,1 and 13,7%, respectively. The MAPE error for water vapor pressure deficit and solar radiation is 20,2 and 26,3%, respectively. The largest MAPE error of 40,3% was established for wind speed measurements. The average MAPE error between the calculated ET0, based on the meteorological data of the Askania-Nova station, and the actual ET0 data obtained from the automatic Internet meteorological station iMetos is 16,8%, RMSE – 0,65 mm, SEE – 0,56 mm. Applying a coefficient of 0,92 when calculating ET0 reduces the errors of MAPE, RMSE, and SEE by 3,2%, 0,15 mm, and 0,05 mm, respectively, for all calculation periods. For the May-August period, the MAPE error was 10,7%, which brings the calculations close to high accuracy (MAPE <10%). Based on the results of the calculations, it was established that on average over the years of research, the actual ET0 was 68 mm less than the calculated one. The absolute errors of determination of ETc depended on the crop and the average over the years of research ranged from 33 mm (winter wheat) to 68 mm (early tomatoes). The application of the refined value of ET0 in calculations reduces the absolute errors in the determination of c over the years of research, this error did not exceed 6 mm (early tomato). Research results confirm the possibility of using meteorological indicators obtained from state meteorological stations to calculate ET0. To increase the accuracy of calculations, it is necessary to use a refinement coefficient.
References
2. Kiraga, S., Peters, R.T., Molaei, B., Evett, S.R., & Marek, G. (2024). Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Genetic Algorithm-Optimized Machine Learning Models and Standardized Penman–Monteith Equation in a Highly Advective Environment. Water, 16(1):12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010012
3. Ndiaye, P., Bodian, A., Diop, L. & Djaman, K. (2017). Sensitivity Analysis of the Penman-Monteith Reference Evapotranspiration to Climatic Variables: Case of Burkina Faso. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 1364-1376.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.912087.
4. Raza, A., Shoaib, M., & Faiz, M.A. (2020). Comparative Assessment of Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Conventional Method and Machine Learning Algorithms in Four Climatic Regions. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 4479–450.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02473-5
5. Raza, A., Hu, Y., Shoaib, M., Abd Elnabi, M. K., Zubair, M., Nauman, M., & Syed, N. R. (2021). A Systematic Review on Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration under Prisma Guidelines. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(6), 5413-5422.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/136348
6. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage, Paper 56. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm
7. Dai, L., Fu, R., Zhao, Z., Guo, X., Du, Y., Hu, Z., & Cao, G. (2022). Comparison of Fourteen Reference Evapotranspiration Models With Lysimeter Measurements at a Site in the Humid Alpine Meadow, Northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Front. Plant Sci., 13:854196.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.854196
8. Varga-Haszonits, Z., Szalka, É., & Szakál, T. (2022). Determination of Reference Evapotranspiration Using Penman-Monteith Method in Case of Missing Wind Speed Data under Subhumid Climatic Condition in Hungary. Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 12, 235-245.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2022.122014.
9. Delgado-Ramírez, G., Bolaños-González, M.A., Quevedo-Nolasco, A., López-Pérez, A., & Estrada-Ávalos, J. (2023). Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration in a Semi-Arid Region of Mexico. Sensors, 23(15):7007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23157007
10. Córdova, M., Carrillo-Rojas, G., Crespo, P., Wilcox, B., & Célleri, R. (2015). Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) Method for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Limited Data. Mountain Research and Development, 35(3), 230-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-0024.1
11. Vásquez, C., Célleri, R., Córdova, M., & Carrillo-Rojas, C. (2022). Improving reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculation under limited data conditions in the high Tropical Andes. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 262, 107439.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107439
12. Seenu, N., Kuppan Chetty, R.M., Srinivas, T., Adithya Krishna, K.M., & Selokar, A. (2019). Reference Evapotranspiration Assessment Techniques for Estimating Crop Water Requirement. IJRTE, Vol. 8(4), 1094-1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D6738.118419
13. FieldClimate by Pessl instrument. Retrieved from: https://ng.fieldclimate.com
14. Kovalenko, І., & Zhuravlov, O. (2023). Vyznachennia faktychnoi evapotranspiratsii tomativ rozrakhunkovymy metodamy [Determination of the actual evapotranspiration of tomatoes by calculation methods]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 8(845), 54-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202308-07 [in Ukrainian].
15. Dotsenko, V., & Kapusta, M. (2021). Calculation of corn irrigation regime by FAO method in conditions Dnipropetrovsk region [Rozrakhunok rezhymu zroshennia kukurudzy metodom FAO v umovakh Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti]. Water management, water engineering and water technologies: Materials of the university student conference (May 11-13, 2021). Dnipro: DDAEU, 29-32 p. http://dspace.dsau.dp.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/5491 [in Ukrainian]
16. Meteopost. Archive of meteorological data. View the actual weather for a specific date. Retrieved from: https://meteopost.com/weather/archive
17. Technical catalogue Metos ® by Pessl Instruments. (2017). Pessl Instruments GmbH. Werksweg 107, 8160 Weiz, Austria, 132 r.
18. Ostapchik, V. P., Kostromin, V. A., & Koval, A. M. (1989). Informatsionno-sovetuyushchaya sistema upravleniya orosheniyem [Information and advisory irrigation management system]. Kiev: Urozhay, 248 p. [In Russian].
19. Tishchenko, A. P. (2003). Upravleniye rezhimami orosheniya selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur po instrumentalnomu metodu [Management of irrigation regimes for agricultural crops using the instrumental method]. Simferopol: Tavriya, 240 p. [in russian].
20. Buduko, M.I. (1974). Climate and Life. San Diego: Academic Press, 508 p.
21. Zhuravlov, O.V. (2021). Scientific and practical substantiation of methods of soil water regime management in irrigated conditions [Naukovo-praktychne obgruntuvannia metodiv upravlinnia vodnym rezhymom gruntu v umovakh zroshennia]. Thesis of the Doctor of agricultural science academic degree by specialty 06.01.02 – agricultural melioration (agricultural sciences) – Institute of Water Problems and Reclamation of NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, 350 p. https://drive.google.com/file/d/13rDjDgifhiEU6M7Hka7HfaQONo1m1Hpl/view [in Ukrainian].
22. Shcherbakov, M.V., Brebels, A., Shcherbakova, N.L., Tyukov, A.P., Janovsky, T.A., & Kamaev, V.A. (2013). A Survey of Forecast Error Measures. World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 24, 171-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.24.itmies.80032
23. Sak, A. V. (2006). Prognozirovaniye i planirovaniye ekonomiki [Economic forecasting and planning]. Minsk: BGUIR. 209 p. [in russian].