EVALUATION OF THE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF RESTORATION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN THE HUMID ZONE OF UKRAINE: MAKING INVESTMENT DECISIONS

Keywords: drainage system, restoration of drainage systems, economic efficiency, scenario approach, investment project

Abstract

Approaches to assessment of the economic effectiveness of restoring drainage systems in the humid zone of Ukraine are substantiated. A conceptual scheme has been developed that determines the stages of evaluation, sources of the input array of information, strategic orientation, and invariance of restoration projects, provides for considering a number of risks and limitations of a systemic and non-systemic nature when evaluating the project effectiveness of strategic alternatives. The basis of the evaluation is the results of the analysis of materials regarding the technical condition of drainage systems, the restoration of which in the drainage area is carried out according to two options: modernization of working (on an area of 1311,2 thousand ha) and restoration of non-working (on an area of 1962,9 thousand ha) drainage systems. In the calculations of restoration (modernization) costs, the results of a preliminary assessment of the cost of restoration work for various types of drainage systems (drainage, drainage-humidification, polder, and water circulation systems) were used based on the reduced costs for restoration of the intra-farm and inter-farm network, which were adopted in the "Strategy of Irrigation and Drainage ..." [27]. The economic indicators of the production of agricultural crops economically attractive to farming producers (grain corn, sunflower, rapeseed, soybean) were calculated under the conditions of their production before and after the implementation of the project of restoration (modernization) of drainage systems. The application of the traditional scheme for projected indicators calculating, at which the discount rate was defined as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is substantiated. Taking into account the specifics of drainage system restoration (modernization) projects and their duration, the weighted average rates for long-term loans and deposits (risk-free) for legal entities, taking into account the inflation component and the value of equity capital of agro-industrial complex enterprises, were chosen as the discount rate for the preliminary pre-investment analysis. Based on the calculation of the project effectiveness of the restoration (modernization) of drainage systems using the scenario approach according to the consolidated option for determining the payback of investment costs, it is proved that the options at the discount rates r1 (for 2021) and r2 (for the beginning of 2022), as well as the discount rate for the equity scheme, they give positive indicators of the investment project, which indicates the expediency of its implementation and economic efficiency. The internal rate of return for the three options shows a sufficient margin of safety (24–26%). The most economically expedient is the option with a source of financing from the equity capital of agro-industrial complex enterprises, for which the non-discounted (RR) and discounted (DPP) payback terms are 3,4 and 4,7 years, respectively.

Author Biographies

H. V. Voropai, Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation of NAAS, Kyiv, 03022

Ph.D. 

B. V. Dergaliuk, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 03056, Kyiv, Ukraine

Dr. of Economic Sc.

O. P. Kavtysh, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 03056, Kyiv, Ukraine

Ph.D.

References

1. Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir R. (2015). A history of agricultural land drainage. Proceedings of the 43rd International Symposium on Agricultural Engineering, Actual Tasks on Agricultural Engineering, Opatija, Croatia, 24-27 February, p.19-29.
2. Tekrony R.G., &Sanders G.D. (2004). History of drainage in the bureau of reclamation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 130, Iss. 2, P. 265-279.
3. Kozhushko, L. F., & Velesyk, T. A. (2015). Formuvannia rynku osushenykh semel silskohospodarskogo prysnachennia [Formation of the market for agricultural agricultural land: Monograph]. Rivne: NUVHP. [in Ukrainian].
4. Baljuk, S.A., Romashhenko, M.I., & Truskavetskyi, R.S. (2015). Melioratsiia gruntiv (systematyka, perspektyvy, innovatsiyi): kolektyvna monografiia [Soil reclamation (systematics, perspectives, innovations): a collective monograph]. Kherson: Grin D.S. [in Ukrainian].
5. Hadzalo, Ia.M., Stashuk, V.A., &Rokochynskyi, A.M. (2017). Melioratsiia I oblashtuvannia Ukrainskoho Polissia [Land reclamation and arrangement of Ukrainian Polissya]. Kherson: OLDI-PLJUS, 1, 923. [in Ukrainian].
6. Voropay, G.V., Yatsyk. M.B., & Mozol, N.V. (2019). Suchasnyy stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku osushuval`nykh melioratsiy v umovakh zmin klimatu [Current state and the prospects of development of drainage reclamation in a changing climate]. Melioratsiia i vodne hospodarstvo, 2, 31–39. [in Ukrainian].
7. Voropay, G.V. (2021). Suchasni aspekty naukovoho zabezpechennia vidnovlennia drenazhnykh system humidnoyi sony Ukrayiny [Modern aspects of scientific support of restoration of drainage systems humid zone of Ukraine]. Melioratsiia i vodne hospodarstvo, 1, 39–51. [in Ukrainian].
8. Giulia S. (2014). Modification of artificial drainage networks during the past half-century: Evidence and effects in a reclamation area in the Veneto floodplain (Italy). Anthropocene. Vol. 6, p. 48–62.
9. Minaev, I.V., & Maslov, B.S. (2009). History of Land Improvement. In Agricultural Land Improvement: Amelioration and Reclamation. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS); Eolss Publ. Co. Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1, 95–116.
10. Maslov, B.S. (2008). Voprosy istoriyi melioratsiyi torfianykh bolot I rasvitiye nauki [Questions of the history of reclamation of peat bogs and the development of science]. Vestnyk TGPU, 4(78). 64-69. [in Russian].
11. De Wrachien D. (2003). Drainage and Land Reclamation in a Changing Environment: Overview and Challenges. International conference on land reclamation and water resources development. P. 234-238.
12. Ryskulov, D. M. (1988) Zarubezhnye metody ekonomicheskoy ozenki effektivnosti meliorativnykh I vodokhoziaystvennykh proektov [Foreign Methods of Economic Evaluation of the Efficiency of Land Reclamation and Water Management Projects]. Melioratsiia i vodnoe khosiaystvo. Ekonomika i upravleniye v melioraziyi i vodnom khoziaystve: obzornaia informatsia. TsBNTI Minvodkhoza SSSR. Moskva, 2,1-48. [in Russian].
13. Adamonite, I. (2005). Issledovaniye tekhnicheskikh investitsionnykh reshenii rekonstruktsii osushitelnykh system v Litve [Study of technical investment solutions for the reconstruction of drainage systems in Lithuania]. Povysheniye effektivnosti melioratsii selskokhoziaistvennykh zemel. Doklady mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Minsk, 19-23. [in Russian].
14. Hordiychuk, A. S., & Stakhiv, O. A. (2000). Ekonomika i orhanizatsia diialnosti vodohospodarskykh pidpryemstv [Economics and organization of activities of water management enterprises]. Rivne; RDTU. [in Ukrainian].
15. Kozhushko, L., Okorskyi, V., & Kostjukevych, R. (2001). Stratehichni problem menedzhmentu u vodnomu hospodarstviv umovakh zemelnoyi reformy [Strategic problems of management in water management in the conditions of land reform]. Vodne hospodarstvo Ukrayiny, 3-4, 18-24. [in Ukrainian].
16. Trehobchuk, V. M. (1990). Ekonomiko-ekologicheskie problem gidromelioratsii [Economic and environmental problems of hydromelioration]. AN USSR. Institut ekonomiky. Kiev: Naukova dumka. [in Russian].
17. Khachaturov, T. S. (1979). Effektivnost kapitalnykh vlozheniy [Efficiency of capital investments]. Moskva: Ekonomika. [in Russian].
18. Khvesyk, M., & Kovshun, N. (1996). Do pytannia metodolohii vyznachennia ekoloho-ekonomichnoyi efektyvnosti osushuvalnykh melioratsiy [To the issue of the methodology of determining the ecological and economic efficiency of drainage reclamations]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny, 4, 83-87. [in Ukrainian].
19. Khvesyk, M. A., & Radkevych, N. M. (2003). Kompleksnyi analiz rozvytky vodnykh melioratsiy v Ukraini [Comprehensive analysis of the development of water reclamation in Ukraine]. Kyiv: RVPS Ukrayiny NAN Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian].
20. Vatamanjuk, Z. H., & Styrskyi, M. V. (1998). Roblemy zastosuvannia dynamichnykh metodiv otsinky investyziynykh proektiv [Problems of applying dynamic methods of assessment of investment projects]. Finansy Ukrayiny, 5, 5-10. [in Ukrainian].
21. Komarov, A. G., & Rogova, E. M. (2001). Investizionnoe proektirovanie: uchebnoe posobie [Investment design: textbook. allowance]. 3-ye izd. SPb.: SPbGUEF. [in Russian].
22. Kommercheskaia osenka investitsionnykh proektov. Osnovnye polozhnia metodiki [Commercial evaluation of investment projects. The main provisions of the methodology]. altrc.ru. Retrieved from www.altrc.ru/common/art64-3.shtml.
23. Pokasznyky efektyvnosti investytsiynoho proektu za modellju prostykh ta skladnykh protsentiv [Performance indicators of the investment project based on the model of simple and compound interest]. pidru4niki.com Retrieved from :
https://pidru4niki.com/15100827/investuvannya/pokazniki_efektivnosti_investitsiynogo_proektu_modellyu_prostih_skladnih_protsentiv.
24. Hadzalo, Ia.M., Stashuk, V.A., &Rokochynskyi, A.M. (2017). Melioratsiia I oblashtuvannia Ukrainskoho Polissia [Land reclamation and arrangement of Ukrainian Polissya]. Kherson: OLDI-PLJUS, 2, 854. [in Ukrainian].
25. Koval, N. V. (2010). Obgruntuvannia velychyny dyskontnoi stavky dlia rozrakhunku prognoznoyi efektyvnosti investytsiynykh proektiv v Ukraini [Justification of the value of the discount rate for calculating the forecast efficiency of investment projects in Ukraine]. Investytsiyi: praktuka ta dosvid, 9, 9-13. [in Ukrainian].
26. Metodychni recomendatsiyi z rozrobky biznes-planiv investytsiynykh proektiv [Methodological recommendations for the development of business plans for investments projects]. 2010. Nakaz Derzhavnoho ahent·stva Ukrayiny z investytsiy ta rozvytku 31.08.2010 № 73 [Order of the State Agency of Ukraine for Investments and Development dated August 31, 2010 No. 73]. Retrieved from: http://econom.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/met-rekom-mbi.pdf.
27. Stratehia sroshennia ta drenazhu v Ukraini na perid do 2030 roku. [Irrigation and drainage strategy in Ukraine for the period until 2030] (2019). Skhvaleno Kabinetom Ministriv Ukrainy 14.08.2019. № 688-r. [in Ukrainian].
28. Pro zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv z realizatsii Stratehii. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua › 1567-2020-r. [in Ukrainian].
29. Pernarivskyi, O.V. 2017. Modelyuvannya stavky dyskontuvannya z urakhuvannyam investytsiynykh ryzykiv [Discount rate modeling taking investments risks into account]. Abstracts of the 4th International scientific and practical conference "Formation of an effective model of enterprise development in the conditions of a market economy". Retrieved from: https://conf.ztu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/477.pdf.
30. Vyznachennya stavky dyskontuvannya: svizhi porady vid Minfinu [Determination of the discount rate: fresh advice from the Ministry of Finance]. 2020. Debetu-Kredyt [Debit-Credit]. Retrieved from: https://news.dtkt.ua/accounting/individual-transactions/63917.
31. Fedonin, O. S., Repina, I. M., &Oleksjuk, O. I. (2006). Potenzial pidpryemstva: formuvannia ta otsinka: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Enterprise potential: formation and assessment: education. manual]. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
32. Voropay, G. V. (2020). Silskohospodarske vykorystannia osushuvanykh zemel humidnoi zony Ukrainy v umovakh reformuvannia agrarnoho sektoru ta zmin klimatu [Agricultural use of drained lands of the humid zone of Ukraine in the conditions of agricultural sector reform and climate change]. Visnyk agrarnoi nauky, 11, 62-73. [in Ukrainian].
33. Silske, lisove ta rybne hospodarstvo. Retrieved from ukrstat.gov.ua › druk › publicat › kat_u › publ7_u.
34. Romashhenko, M. I., &Tarariko, Ju. O. (2017). Otsinka ta ratsionalne vykorystannia agroresursnoho potentsialu Ukrainy (zony zroshennia і osushennia) [Reclaimed agroecosystems. Assessment and rational use of agricultural resource potential of Ukraine (irrigation and drainage zones)]. Nizhyn: PP Lysenko M.M., 696. [in Ukrainian].
35. Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/files/4-Financial_markets.xls.
36. Osnovni makropokaznyky ekonomichnoho i sotsialnoho rozvytku Ukrainy na 2021 pik: ekspertnyi ogliad [The main macro indicators of economic and social development of Ukraine for 2021: expert review]. Retrieved from https://decentralization.gov.ua/news/12690
37. Tablytsia indeksiv infliatsii sa 2011-2022 [Table of inflation indices for 2011-2022.]. Retrieved from rr.https://buhgalter.com.ua/dovidnik/norma-robochogo-chasu/tablitsya-indeksiv-inflyatsiyi.
38. Pro organizatsii vodokorystuvachiv ta stymuljuvannia hidrotekhnichnoi melioratsii zemel Retrieved from Pro organіzacіyi vodokorystuvachіv ta stymulyuvannya gіdrotehnіchnoyi melіoracіyi zemel LIGA:ZAKON (ligazakon.net).
39. Retrieved from https://agro.me.gov.ua/ua/news/uryad-rozshiriv-derzhavnu-pidtrimku-agrariyiv-na-2021-rik.
Published
2022-12-10
How to Cite
Voropai, H., Dergaliuk, B., & Kavtysh, O. (2022). EVALUATION OF THE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF RESTORATION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN THE HUMID ZONE OF UKRAINE: MAKING INVESTMENT DECISIONS. Land Reclamation and Water Management, (2), 51 - 64. https://doi.org/10.31073/mivg202202-336

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.