DEWATERING OF WASTEWATER SLUDGE USING BIOFLOCCULATION

Keywords: bioflocculation, sludge dewatering, microbial bioflocculants, activated sludge, wastewater, water treatment

Abstract

Sludge dewatering is a crucial stage in wastewater treatment that significantly affects treatment facilities' environmental and economic efficiency. This article explores the issue of wastewater sludge dewatering using bioflocculation, a biotechnology that involves the natural process of particle aggregation involving microorganisms or their metabolites. Biological wastewater treatment remains a leading approach globally and in Ukraine; however, existing sludge dewatering methods face limitations due to high costs and insufficient efficiency. Bioflocculation helps reduce sludge moisture content, increase dry matter concentration, and decrease waste volume, contributing to resource savings and reduced chemical load. The study analyzes the impact of microbial bioflocculants on sedimentation and dewatering processes, particularly exopolysaccharides produced by Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella bacteria. Parameters influencing efficiency, such as dosage, contact time, pH, and aeration, are considered. Combining bioflocculation with conventional methods, such as centrifugation and mechanical thickening, enhances treatment efficiency while reducing energy and reagent consumption. Special attention is given to the potential implementation of bioflocculation at Ukrainian treatment plants, where the local production of microbial bioflocculants could replace synthetic polymers. Key influencing factors — microbial community composition, physicochemical properties of sludge, and cultivation conditions — are analyzed for their impact on process stability. The advantages of bioflocculation are outlined, including environmental friendliness, reduced product toxicity, improved dewatering, and cost reduction. At the same time, challenges such as microbial adaptation, wastewater variability, and the need for further research to implement the technology are acknowledged. Therefore, bioflocculation is a promising approach to improving wastewater treatment and sludge dewatering, aligning with modern environmental standards and supporting sustainable waste management.

References

1. California Water Plan Highlights. Department of Water Resources Bulletin 160-05. 2005.
2. Tavartkiladze, I. M., Tarasiuk, T. P., & Dotsenko, M. I. (1988). Ochisni sporudy vodovidvedennia: Dovidnyk [Sewerage treatment facilities: Reference book]. Kyiv: Budivelnyk. [in Ukrainian].
3. Kulskii, L. A. (1976). Khimiia i mikrobiolohiia vody [Chemistry and microbiology of water]. [in Russian].
4. Toralova, Y., Ribarova, I., Dimkov, R., & Arsov, R. (1995) Upgrading of a small wastewater treatment plant: design & operation. Water Sci. Tech. vol. 32, № 7, 111–117.
5. Water Treatment Handbook (2 Volumes set, 7th Ed.) (2007). Degrémont.
6. Mosiichuk, Ya. B. (2020). Udoskonalennia tekhnolohii ochyshchennia i vykorystannia stichnykh vod u silskii mistsevosti [Improvement of wastewater treatment and utilization technologies in rural areas] [Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Water Problems and Land Reclamation of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine]. [in Ukrainian].
7. Ahmad, J., Mohd Said, N. S., Ramli, N. N., Buhari, J., Abdullah, S. R. S., Othman, A. R., Wan Jusoh, H. H., Juahir, H., & Kurniawan, S. B. (2024). A review on the roles of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in wastewater treatment: Source, mechanism study, bioproducts, limitations, and future challenges. Water, 16(19), 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192812
8. Kurniawan, S. B., Abdullah, S. R. S., Imron, M. F., Said, N. S. M., Ismail, N., Hasan, H. A., Othman, A. R., & Purwanti, I. F. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities of Biocoagulant/Bioflocculant Application for Drinking Water and Wastewater Treatment and Its Potential for Sludge Recovery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249312
9. Mnif, W., & Ben Rebah, F. (2023). Bioflocculants as alternative to synthetic polymers to enhance wastewater sludge dewaterability: A review. Energies, 16(8), 3392. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083392
10. Yu, L., Tang, Q.-w., Zhang, Y.-j., Chen, R.-p., Liu, X., Qiao, W.-c., Li, W.-w., Ruan, H.-h., & Song, X. (2016). A novel Fe(III) dependent bioflocculant from Klebsiella oxytoca GS-4-08: culture conditions optimization and flocculation mechanism. Scientific Reports, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34980
11. Selepe, T. N., Maliehe, T. S., Moganedi, K., Masoko, P., & Mulaudzi, V. (2022). Isolation and Optimisation of Culture Conditions for a Marine Bioflocculant-Producing Bacterium and Application of Its Bioflocculant in Wastewater Treatment. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(16), 10237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610237
12. Yang, Q., Luo, K., Liao, D.-X., Li, X.-M., Wang, D.-B., Liu, X., & Xu, L. (2012). A novel bioflocculant produced by Klebsiella sp. and its application to sludge dewatering. Water and Environment Journal, 26(3), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00319.x
13. Peng, L., Yang, C., Zeng, G., Wang, L., Dai, C., Long, Z., Liu, H., & Zhong, Y. (2014). Characterization and application of bioflocculant prepared by Rhodococcus erythropolis using sludge and livestock wastewater as cheap culture media. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 98(15), 6847–6858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5725-4
14. Ntsangani, N., Okaiyeto, K., Uchechukwu, N. U., Olaniran, A. O., Mabinya, L. V., & Okoh, A. I. (2017). Bioflocculation potentials of a uronic acid-containing glycoprotein produced by Bacillus sp. AEMREG4 isolated from Tyhume River, South Africa. 3 Biotech, 7(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0695-8
15. Kurade, M. B., Murugesan, K., Selvam, A., Yu, S. M., & Wong, J. W. (2016). Sludge conditioning using biogenic flocculant produced by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans for enhancement in dewaterability. Bioresource technology, 217, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.113
16. Agunbiade, M.O., Van Heerden, E., Pohl, C.H. et al. Flocculating performance of a bioflocculant produced by Arthrobacter humicola in sewage waste water treatment. BMC Biotechnol 17, 51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0375-0
17. Fujita, M., Ike, M., Tachibana, S., Kitada, G., Kim, S.-M., & Inoue, Z. (2000). Characterization of a bioflocculant produced by Citrobacter sp. TKF04 from acetic and propionic acids. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 89(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(00)88048-2
18. Dai, J., Zhao, X., Mu, S., Yang, Q., Zhao, C., & Zhao, Z. (2024). A novel polysaccharide-based bioflocculant produced by Bacillus subtilis 35A and its application in the treatment of dye decolorization, heavy metal ion adsorption and meat product wastewater. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1457909
19. Arimieari, L., & Ademiluyi, J. (2018). Sludge filtration resistance model based on electrical resistance analogy. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2018.91001
20. Guo, J., Liu, J., Yang, Y., Zhou, Y., Jiang, S., & Chen, C. (2018). Fermentation and kinetics characteristics of a bioflocculant from potato starch wastewater and its application. Scientific reports, 8(1), 3631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21796-x
21. Sabliy, L. A. (2013). Fiziko-khimichne ta biolohichne ochyshchennia vysokokoncentrovanykh stichnykh vod: Monohrafiia [Physical and chemical and biological treatment of high-concentration wastewater: Monograph]. Rivne: NUVHP. [in Ukrainian].
22. Koganovskii, A. M., Klimenko, N. A., Levchenko, T. M., et al. (1983). Ochistka i ispolzovanie stochnykh vod v promyshlennom vodosnabzhenii [Treatment and use of wastewater in industrial water supply]. Moskva: Khimiia. [in Russian].
23. Zapolskii, A. K., Mishkova-Klimenko, N. A., Astrelin, I. A., et al. (2000). Fiziko-khimichni osnovy tekhnolohii ochyshchennia stichnykh vod [Physicochemical foundations of wastewater treatment technology] (A. K. Zapolskii, Ed.). Kyiv: Libra. [in Ukrainian].
24. Klimenko, N. A., & Kozhanov, V. A. (1991). Kolloidno-khimicheskie aspekty formirovaniia sostava stochnykh vod tekstilnykh predpriiatii i vozmozhnye metody ikh ochistki [Colloidal-chemical aspects of the formation of the composition of wastewater from textile enterprises and possible treatment methods]. Khimia i tekhnologiia vody, 13(7), 579–592. [in Russian].
25. Sabliy, L. A., & Zhukova, V. S. (2008). Vdoskonalennia roboty kanalizatsiinykh ochysnykh sporud [Improving the operation of sewer treatment facilities]. Vodopostachannia ta vodovidvedennia, (5), 33–36. [in Ukrainian].
26. Khoruzhii, P. D., Khomutetska, T. P., & Khoruzhii, V. P. (2008). Resursosberihaiochi tekhnolohii vodopostachannia [Resource-saving water supply technologies]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka. [in Ukrainian].
Published
2025-07-02
How to Cite
Mosiichuk, A. (2025). DEWATERING OF WASTEWATER SLUDGE USING BIOFLOCCULATION. Land Reclamation and Water Management, (1), 71 - 78. https://doi.org/10.31073/mivg202501-409

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.